"Hereinafter, we focus only on the results for n-C26 as these consistently had the highest, most evenly-shaped peaks and the peaks were present in the most samples."- Terwilliger et al., 2013; ISO2k name: SL13TEAK
"Hereinafter, we focus only on the results for n-C26 as these consistently had the highest, most evenly-shaped peaks and the peaks were present in the most samples."- Terwilliger et al., 2013; ISO2k name: SL13TEAK
"Hereinafter, we focus only on the results for n-C26 as these consistently had the highest, most evenly-shaped peaks and the peaks were present in the most samples."- Terwilliger et al., 2013; ISO2k name: SL13TEAK
I think this is a douplicate of CO00KUNI01Ab (remove)
This is a duplicate
Note: floating fossil coral sections have greater uncertainty in absolute temperature for palaeoclimate reconstructions (NJA)
NM: Marked as false because it has <50 years of continuous data
Note: floating fossil coral sections have greater uncertainty in absolute temperature for palaeoclimate reconstructions (NJA)
Diploastrea heliopora specie; test regarding Diploasrea sampling strategy over the first 50 mm
Diploastrea heliopora specie
Composite of CO04BAFI01A and CO04BAFI02A
No ages.
Kilbourne et al., 2004, and Kilbourne et al., 2004, (10.1029/2004PA001033, 10.1029/2003PA000944) both report on the same data.
d13C: not SST sensitive
used in Tierney et al, as a composite with HR_156; the original records are provided here rather than composites
Combined influenced of SST and SSS on the d18O signal - with SST leading seasoanl variability and SSS interannual and decadal varaibility (Linsley et al., 2006)
Combined influenced of SST and SSS on the d18O signal - with SST leading seasoanl variability and SSS interannual and decadal varaibility (Linsley et al., 2006)
Combined influenced of SST and SSS on the d18O signal - with SST leading seasoanl variability and SSS interannual and decadal varaibility (Linsley et al., 2006)
This is a duplicate record
d18Osw is probably the primary control on d18O of the coral at this site; authors found positive relation btwn 18O and temperature, opposite the expected
Composite of CO04BAFI00A and the rest of the 4F1 record - 2 diploastra records
Note: floating fossil coral sections have greater uncertainty in absolute temperature for palaeoclimate reconstructions (NJA)
used in Tierney et al, as a composite with HR_157; the original records are provided here rather than composites
Siderastrea radians specie
d13C: not SST sensitive
d13C: not SST sensitive
d13C: not SST sensitive
annually banded record; multi-annual resolution
annually banded record; multi-annual resolution
Kilbourne 2007, 2008, and 2010 are all the same coral with radiocarbon 2007 and new coral in 2010 extending record to 1479.
d13C: not SST sensitive
Hetzinger 2006 is  the calibration paper and Hetzinger 2010 is the full reconstruction with interpretation. Confirmed the data reported for both studies on NOAA web site is the identical.
d18Osw (residuals calculated from coupled SrCa and d18O measurements)
Duplicate of modern coral d18O in CO03COPM01A, also included in composite record Ocean2kHR_139
d13C: not SST sensitive
This time series needs to be replaced-- erroneous values!
The data on the NOAA web site combines the two cores together into one long record, the dead coral cores spans 1411-1644 with some overlap and the modern coral spans 1915-1944. The Geology paper and supplemental data do not have much methods information and I downloaded Kellys dissertaion but it is just the published papers. I am familar with the Quinns lab procedures so I filled in information where I could. This is one of the few coral records that spans the earlier part of the LIA so it is important to include even if it is not continous. Kelly has another coral record in her dissertaion for the Medieval Climate Anomaly from Tasmaloum, Vanuatu (15.6i¿½S, 166.9i¿½E), and I am not sure her status with publishing this work but I will ask Terry.
The data on the NOAA web site combines the two cores together into one long record, the dead coral cores spans 1411-1644 with some overlap and the modern coral spans 1915-1944. The Geology paper and supplemental data do not have much methods information and I downloaded Kellys dissertaion but it is just the published papers. I am familar with the Quinns lab procedures so I filled in information where I could. This is one of the few coral records that spans the earlier part of the LIA so it is important to include even if it is not continous. Kelly has another coral record in her dissertaion for the Medieval Climate Anomaly from Tasmaloum, Vanuatu (15.6i¿½S, 166.9i¿½E), and I am not sure her status with publishing this work but I will ask Terry.
The data on the NOAA web site combines the two cores together into one long record, the dead coral cores spans 1411-1644 with some overlap and the modern coral spans 1915-1944. The Geology paper and supplemental data do not have much methods information and I downloaded Kellys dissertaion but it is just the published papers. I am familar with the Quinns lab procedures so I filled in information where I could. This is one of the few coral records that spans the earlier part of the LIA so it is important to include even if it is not continous. Kelly has another coral record in her dissertaion for the Medieval Climate Anomaly from Tasmaloum, Vanuatu (15.6i¿½S, 166.9i¿½E), and I am not sure her status with publishing this work but I will ask Terry.
several distinct postive anomalies between 1977 and 1986 should be interpreted with caution. Authors note that these anomalies could be attributed to vital effects or diagensis and should be reproduced with additional cores from Timor
several distinct postive anomalies between 1977 and 1986 should be interpreted with caution. Authors note that these anomalies could be attributed to vital effects or diagensis and should be reproduced with additional cores from Timor
Fixed latitude & temporal coverage DMT 3/24/2018
d13C: not SST sensitive
see Osborne et al. (2013) for discrepancies in the UC composite.
d13C: not SST sensitive
Fixed time coverage
Fixed location
Monthly data used for calibration
bimonthly resolution record
Time axis is in the csv file, but formatting issue during LiPD conversion
Time axis is in the csv file, but formatting issue during LiPD conversion
Years are all NaNs
Pavona gigantae - Original data - Dumbar et al., 1994 and updated version Druffel et al., 2015     https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo/f?p=519:1:::::P1_STUDY_ID:18255  https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo/f?p=519:1:::::P1_STUDY_ID:16971
Growth rate study and interpretation
Growth rate study and interpretation
At decadal time scale the d18O signal is only influenced by d18Osw (Salinity and precipitation), NO influence of Temperature
The study was 4 samples per year but data is given as annual average values on NOAA web site. The original meta data on NOAA states there are four files, vanuatu.xls (Microsoft Excel Workbook), vanuatu.2yr.txt, vanuatu.4yr.txt, vanuatu.annual.txt (Tab-delimited text), but these appear to be missing from NOAA web site now. I have a copy archived of these files (kdelong@lsu.edu).
The authors note that their coral was not sampled optimally for intra-annual variabilty and their sampling method did not capture the seasonal cycle (Leder et al., 1996). The authors also note that they may have sampled off the thecal wall and may have included endothecal material what would have represented different time intervals. Montastraea annularis (may actually be M. faveolata; this coral definition varies with time) reproduces in the summer and they deposit a high denisty band, which Swart assumes in July. It is possible this coral does not grow at a constant rate and slows its extention in the warmer summer months, thus the annual mean d18O could be bias towards non-summer months. Examining this annual d18O record versus monthly SST and SSS, similar to tree-ring studies may provide further insight on how to interprete this record.
This coral species is Solenastrea bournoni, one not used in coral climate reconstructions, and it is located in a complex system of Florida Bay where waters from the Everglades enter the ocean and ther eare high rates of evaporation. The d18O system is not additive but subtractive for SSS and SST. Swart 1999 revisited this coral colony and they collect a new core from the same colony. Hudson 1989 gives a map with the coral location, which is 24degrees 55 minutes, and ~80 degrees and between 40 and 50 minutes, about 44 minutes nu my eye. Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W
Sr/Ca data also available, could be used to calculate d18Osw
d13C: not SST sensitive
Duplicate with Quinn 2002, Stephans 2004 for the interval 1992-1967 only. DeLong 2012 and 2013 updated the chronology for Quinn 1998, updated d18O and d13C paper is in progress. The new bottom date is 1649 and is based on cross-dating two cores and several 230Th dates. DeLong 2013 details several sections that were suboptimally sampled and replaced with new optimal sampling paths. Use this record with caution since it has changed.
Siderastrea spp.,  the influence of salinity overwhelms the temperautre influence on the oxygen isotopic composition of corals
There is a 0.2 per mil offset in absolute value between the Nauru 1 and 2 records; The offset is ~0.23 per mil prior to 1980 and ~0.14 per mil after 1980
There is a 0.2 per mil offset in absolute value between the Nauru 1 and 2 records; The offset is ~0.23 per mil prior to 1980 and ~0.14 per mil after 1981
No salinity influence on the d18O signal
No salinity influence on the d18O signal
Some chronology issue can be due to fish grazzing scars  Influence of salinity on coral d18O variability very small and not constant with time (some year more affected than some others)
Some chronology issue can be due to fish grazzing scars  Influence of salinity on coral d18O variability very small and not constant with time (some year more affected than some others)
Some chronology issue can be due to fish grazzing scars  Influence of salinity on coral d18O variability very small and not constant with time (some year more affected than some others)
NOTED from downloading Swart1999 data, it is very different from Swart1996 even though the paper says it was the same coral, core, and data, not sure why, will have to contact Peter Swart to ask and look at Healy thesis. This coral species is Solenastrea bournoni, one not used in coral climate reconstructions, and it is located in a complex system of Florida Bay where waters from the Everglades enter the ocean and ther eare high rates of evaporation. The d18O system is not additive but subtractive for SSS and SST. Swart 1999 revisited this coral colony and they collect a new core from the same colony. Hudson 1989 gives a map with the coral location, which is 24degrees 55 minutes, and ~80 degrees and between 40 and 50 minutes, about 44 minutes nu my eye. Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W
NOTED from downloading Swart1999 data, it is very different from Swart1996 even though the paper says it was the same coral, core, and data, not sure why, will have to contact Peter Swart to ask and look at Healy thesis. This coral species is Solenastrea bournoni, one not used in coral climate reconstructions, and it is located in a complex system of Florida Bay where waters from the Everglades enter the ocean and ther eare high rates of evaporation. The d18O system is not additive but subtractive for SSS and SST. Swart 1999 revisited this coral colony and they collect a new core from the same colony. Hudson 1989 gives a map with the coral location, which is 24degrees 55 minutes, and ~80 degrees and between 40 and 50 minutes, about 44 minutes nu my eye. Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W
Exclude from iso2k: D-excess is a derived variable.
Exclude from iso2k: Derived variable based on measured isotopes and assumptions of long-term changes in sea water
Exclude from iso2k: Derived variable based on measured isotopes and assumptions of long-term changes in sea water
Exclude from iso2k: Derived variable based on measured isotopes and assumptions of long-term changes in sea water
Exclude from iso2k: Derived variable based on measured isotopes and assumptions of long-term changes in sea water, and estimated local temperature-d18O sensitivity.
Exclude from iso2k: Derived variable based on measured isotopes and assumptions of long-term changes in sea water, and estimated local temperature-d18O sensitivity.
Exclude from iso2k: Derived variable based on measured isotopes and assumptions of long-term changes in sea water, and estimated local temperature-d18O sensitivity.
The reference has been changed : Cole-Dai was not the isotope record, it's Moseley-Thompson. Added secondary reference of Masson 2000
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
decadal data
annual data
added interpretation, which is not the mean annual temperature, but not sure if I should delete all interpretation fields.
TO: fixed climate and isotope interpretation
TO: fixed climate and isotope interpretation
TO: fixed second pub
TO: fixed climate and isotope interpretation
TO: the data need a correction
TO: this entry should be deleted
TO: the data need a correction
TO: this entry should be deleted
TO: the data need a correction
TO: this entry should be deleted
Holocene record
TO: fixed climate and isotope interpretation
AO : fixed original citation to Watanabe
TO: fixed climate and isotope interpretation
updated chronology (2011)
AO : fixed original citation to Watanabe
AO: fixed year (2009) of original citation, and basis for isotope interpretation
series is flat (mean only)
DVD: fixed lat/lon
DVD: fixed lat/lon
DVD: fixed lat/lon
TO: fixed climate and isotope interpretation
AO: fixed references
2K series
2K series
not a d18O record, furthermore there is a longer record available (IC13OPAN01A)
stack of 4 series
DVD: winter season
DVD: winter season
DYE-3_18C summer series
DVD: delete?
DVD: delete?
DVD: delete?
DVD: delete?
DVD: delete?
DVD: delete?
DVD: winter season
DVD: winter season
DVD: winter season
PC1 from 14 ice cores
PC2 from 14 ice cores
PC3 from 14 ice cores
DVD: winter season
DVD: winter season
DVD: winter season
DVD: Site G ! winter season
DVD: Site E ! winter season
AO: fixed publi DOI; no isotope interpretation in the publication, and no altitude given either. TP added elevation
AO: added isotope interpretation
AO: added isotope interpretation
AO: added isotope interpretation, fixed DOI which was pointing to the wrong paper
AO :fixed primary reference and isotope interpretation
duplicate record to be deleted
AO: added isotope interpretation. Isotope interpretation is tied to atmospheric circulation, should we change the primary interpretation field?
AO: added isotope interpretation.
AO: added isotope interpretation.
TO: Authors asked to exclude this record.
DVD: a stack of North Greenland Traverse d18O records (BXX cores)
AO: added isotope interpretation.
AO: added isotope interpretation.
AO: added isotope interpretation.
AO: added isotope interpretation.
AO: added isotope interpretation.
DVD: 2K record; 2 years shift in chrono relative to https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/polar/devon/d7273del_5yr.txt
DVD: annual series from https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/polar/devon/d73del_1yr.txt
DVD: data from https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/greenland/gisp/dye2/dye2ad77.txt
DVD: data from https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.56088?format=html#download
TO: This should be high-res (sub-annual) values of IC93BAGI01A but apparently something went wrong in the datatable
AO: added isotope interpretation, doi and chronology information. TP added elevation
DVD: data from https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/polar/agassiz/a87del18_1yr.txt  ; corrected coordinates
TO: thermal year (Aug-Jul) annual values
TO: calender year annual values
TO: thermal year (Aug-Jul) annual values
TO: monthly values
TO: 100 year mean values, ages in BP --> needs to be corrected
AO: added isotope interpretation, doi and chronology information
AO: changed primary reference from 1996 to 1990. added DOI, added isotope interpretation
DVD: data from https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/greenland/summit/gisp2/isotopes/d18o1yr.txt
DVD: data from https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/polar/penny/penny95/d18o/del25ysg_954.txt
AO: added isotope interpretation, doi and chronology information
AO: added isotope interpretation, doi and chronology information
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
this is a shorter record at the same site as IC00OE03
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
AO: fixed primary reference to Graf 2002, in accordance with Pangea
DK: The LiPD file looks corupt. I assume that there should be data for 3 types of CaCO3 (snails, 'codes, and algae). Plus, time series should extend to 4.5 ka  MJ: LiPD file works ok in Playground, there are three core drives displayed seperately. AZ: check if chronology and/or sensor integration time. integrationTime "uncertainty type" given but no time units.
AR:BA - check chronology versus sensor integration time (GF)
AR:BA - check chronology versus sensor integration time (GF)
DK: Rejected: Does not meet criteria for geochronology. Youngest age is 2.8 ka. BM, ZK: 04/01/2019: wrong coordinates, should be W not E, should be S not N
check if chronology and/or sensor integration time.
check if chronology and/or sensor integration time.
check if chronology and/or sensor integration time.
BM, ZK 04/01/2019: wrong longitude, should be W not E
check if chronology and/or sensor integration time. integrationTime "uncertainty type" given but no time or time units. (GF)
MJ: Longitude written in paper not the same as shown on map in paper.
DK: Chronlogy based on existing published version, but has been updated in 2018, but not yet publised. Upate affects ages older than 11 ka.
Has 'basis' for isotopeInterpretation3 but no further information
Check symbols in isotopeInterpretation2 section (GF); missing IntegrationTime units. -BK
TP: added elevation
integrationtime info should be moved to Sensor Integration time columns? Also, check that integration time is 1-10yrs with uncertainty of 10 years? -BK
Needs entry for isotopeInterpretation1_name. Inferred material is missing.
Needs entry for isotopeInterpretation1_name (GF). Inferred material is missing. ET: duplicate of LS13BAFLC
AA: This record is a duplicate of LS14ZHJU (and is a shorter version of the latter record). This study's unique record is dinosterol d2H, which LS14ATJU01A.
climate impact of the Westerlies was apparently not only restricted to the summer season but also significant during winter as indicated by recurrent episodes of enhanced allochthonous input through snowmelt
Invalid variable name ET:duplicate of LS15AIKAB?
changed IntegrationTime uncertainty type to "resolution" but should probably be "Chronological." Though, note that resolution doesn't really need to be in here because it can be calculated from the age model.-BK
lake residence time move to sensor/archiveIntegration Time? also, changed "approx 10 years" to "10" -BK
ET: duplicate of LS15DOCHC?
ET: duplicate of LS15DOSAC?
no IntegrationTime given, but units/type are given. please clarify-BK
no IntegrationTime given, but units/type are given. please clarify-BK
Check inferred material. Should be lake water or soil water. Indicate amount effect in climate variable field. Check:isotopeInterpretation1_name: 'rainfall amount' should be 'P_isotope' if inferred from P_isotope?? G. Falster
MJ: Simple second order polynomila age depth model used from calibrated dates reported in paper
move some chronIntegrationTime to Sensor/ArchiveIntegrationTime?-BK
DK: 18O on ostracodes. Another time series is published on gastropods. The two are very similar.
Check symbols in isotopeInterpretation2_coefficient. Has isotopeInterpretation3_basis but no other details. lake residence time move to sensorIntegration?-BK
DK: 18O on gastropods. Another time series is published for another gastropod and an ostracode speices. All three are very similar, although ostracodes are less complete.
DK: Most complete of three ostracode species analyzed.
DK: Reject and defer to ostracode-based timeseries. Good for replication
Doose-Rolinski
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019. LJ. Isotope data have depth
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Southern0045aLamy2002_GeoB3313-1
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Inadequate chronological constraints, final record that was entered contained an updated age model and dating constraints;
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Identical to O2kLR_074
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Atlantic0368Keigwin2003__MC-29D_alkenone
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Identical to O2kLR_066
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Atlantic0326cLund2006_MgCa_dry-tortugas_62MC
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Atlantic0326aLund2006_MgCa_MC125_GreatBahamaBank
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Identical to LPD7c7e19c5
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Atlantic0326bLund2006_MgCa_MC118_GreatBahamaBank
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Identical to LPDefb3d2b0
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Dataset contains NaN values and datapoints whose chronology is not QCd
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.
time series split, but not updated in v0.10. Final QC in next version
time series split, but not updated in v0.10. Final QC in next version
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Pacific0118Stott2007_MD98-2176 WDC-paleoclimatology Data Contribution Series # 2007-092 Readme for Stott et al., (2007) notes calibration with Anand et al., (2003).
LJ (03AUG2017) not relevant for 2k, but raw data had 2 different ages for 671 cm
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Pacific0185Stott2007_MD98-2181 WDC-paleoclimatology Data Contribution Series # 2007-092 Readme for Stott et al., (2007) notes calibration with Anand et al., (2003).
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019. LJ, old O2k data lack depth
updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Southern0485aMohtadi2007_GeoB7186-3
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Dataset contains NaN values and datapoints whose chronology is not QCd
update has gone missing. updated LiPD file 20/02/2019
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Atlantic0316Weldeab2007__MD03-2707_Mg/Ca
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Contains NaN values
These are the dD values originally archived as MS13GLGG, but merged with this time series as it is the same core
LJ20161212: added years for d18O
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016Pacific0335aOppo2009_MC31,BJ8-03-32GGC,BJ8-03-34GGC Combination of Oppo et al., (2009) data from the three cores recovered from the same drill site. Data sorted based on age.
LJ 12/12/2018: LiPD file contained many errors, would like to see before QC approval
LJ 12/12/2018: LiPD file contained many errors, would like to see before QC approval
LJ 12/12/2018: LiPD file contained many errors, would like to see before QC approval
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Dataset contains NaN values and datapoints whose chronology is not QCd
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Atlantic0220Thornalley2009__RApiD121K_Mg/Ca_bulloides Used the G. bulloides record from this core as it was reported as nearsurface.
LJ 12/12/2018 age model based on dated tephra layers, data available in 10.1038/sdata.2016.425
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Identical to LPD47182517
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Atlantic0058Richter2009__ENAM9606,M200309_Mg/Ca
LJ 12/12/2018 isotope data have depth
LJ (03AUG2017): the age models for Mg/Ca and d18O are not consistent. This is the linearly interpolated d18O age model
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Pacific0173aLinsley2010_13GGC
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Identical to LPD30c5b95c; Datapoints close to 0 CE are not constrained and hence not included
LJ: the age models for Mg/Ca and d18O are not consistent!
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Pacific1577Newton2011_MD982177 Data archived as Mg/Ca values only. Data converted to SST using the calibration of Dekens et al., (2002), as per the original publication.
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Pacific0291Newton2011_MD98-2160 Data archived as Mg/Ca values only. Data converted to SST using the calibration of Dekens et al., 2002, as per the original publication
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Mediterranean1157abMoreno2012_MINMC-2_MINMC-1_alk(Muller) The higher-resolution alkenone record was selected. The authors also note that the G. bulloides Mg/Ca records spring upwelling SSTs whereas alkenones represent annual average SSTs. Alkenone data were measured in two cores (MINMC06-1 and MINMC06-2) from the same site. These two records were combined with the data sorted based on age.
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Atlantic1184Cleroux2012_MD99-2203_MgCa
LJ 12/12/2018. Added raw d18O carbonate. isotope data have depth
HVM, BM, 20/4/2016 Indian1579Saraswat2013_SK237-GC04
These are the original, not quality controlled data. O2kLR recommends only using the Quality controlled data.Dataset chronology not QCd; Final entry truncated.
QC certified, pending change in unique ID to reflect 2016 publication date
ZK (07/01/2019): Pre-Holocene part of the D4 stal.
ZK (07/01/2019): Pre-Holocene part of the D4 stal, NM: It looks like this one does now have data from the past 2k. I've made this the only primary timeseries. ZK (07/01/2019): Pre-Holocene part of the D4 stal. No data from the past 2000yrs
TP: site elevation estimate of 1244 m from Google Earth
LCB: Two stals from the same cave are not cleraly distinguished in the lipdverse. This happens with all names ending 01A 02A 03A, for example
TP: added site elevation
TP: added site elevation
TP: added site elevation
AA (2019-03-08): Data is wonky (e.g. age ranges from -8E9 to 8E9). LCB: Time should cover the last 14k. MJ (30/12/19) there are two speleothems in the paper, one covers the last c. 4k, one from c. 4 to c. 14ka.
TP: added site elevation
TP: elevation estimate from Google Earth. ZK, BM 04/01/2019:  we thought we have to change 'Moisture source' to 'precipitation_Isotope' in column BG; but we can not add a single term to the interpretation, even the direction of the interpretation is problematic ... so one possible solution would be to change this record from 'primary timeseries' to non 'primary timeseries'? but discussed with Bronwen during and we have to discuss this further before qualifying as  'FALSE' in column CB (intended mainly for sites with 2 possible records ans flagging the one to be used)
TP: elevation estimate from Google Earth. ZK, BM 04/01/2019:  we thought we have to change 'Moisture source' to 'precipitation_Isotope' in column BG; but we can not add a single term to the interpretation, even the direction of the interpretation is problematic ... so one possible solution would be to change this record from 'primary timeseries' to non 'primary timeseries'? but discussed with Bronwen during and we have to discuss this further before qualifying as  'FALSE' in column CB (intended mainly for sites with 2 possible records ans flagging the one to be used)
TP: elevation estimate from Google Earth, AA: Decimal separators have been lost from the ages and isotope values (2019-03-08); BM (15/03/2019) info added using the LiPDverse_refers to Cascayunga Cave Speleothem CAS-A), issues sent using GitHub
TP: elevation estimate from Google Earth, AA: Decimal separators have been lost from the ages and isotope values (2019-03-08); BM (15/03/2019) info added using the LiPDverse_refers to Cascayunga Cave Speleothem CAS-D, issues sent using GitHub
No chron data in current LiPD file, needs updating, updated fiel sent to Nick 31/12/19 (MJ)
LCB (28/03/2019): one of the SP10CACN stals is at higher resolution but I cannot distinguish which is which in lipdverse to pick it as the primary one
LCB(29/03/2019): the first tab in lipdverse should be the primary series (no hiatuses). Don't know which one it is
LCB(29/03/2019): the first tab in lipdverse should be the primary series (no hiatuses). Don't know which one it is
LCB(29/03/2019): the first tab in lipdverse should be the primary series (no hiatuses). Don't know which one it is
TP: added site elevation
TP: added site elevation
TP: added mean site elevation (540-600 m)
LCB (29/03/2019): One of the two does not cover the last 2k. The other one should be primary
LCB (29/03/2019): One of the two does not cover the last 2k. The other one should be primary
TP: added site elevation
TP: added site elevation
TP: added site elevation
TP: added site elevation
TP: site elevation estimated from Google Earth
TP: site elevation estimated from Google Earth
TP: site elevation estimated from Google Earth
LCB (29/03/2019): only tab 1 and 2 in lipdverse cover the last 2k. Cannot pick one over the other but the others should all be FALSE
TP: added site elevation
TP: added site elevation, LCB(29/03/2019): one of the two is at higher resolution and should therefore be the primary
TP: added site elevation, LCB(29/03/2019): one of the two is at higher resolution and should therefore be the primary
TP: site elevation estimated from Google Earth
TP: site elevation estimated from Google Earth
TP: added site elevation
TP: added site elevation; TP (30/12/19): In fact, the age information is not missing, but the depth and age columns in the dataset were mislabelled (age column was labelled 'depth', and depth column was labelled 'age'). LCB: Missing age/year. See plot. ZK (14/01/2019) the time span should be 1635 - 1995 AD; BM (14/03/2019) info sent using GitHub
TP: added site elevation; ZK 07/01/2019: The problem is that decimal separators have been lost from the isotope values.
TP: added site elevation; ZK 07/01/2019: The first problem is that decimal separators have been lost from the isotope values. The second problem is that SP14APPE00A and SP14APPE02A duplicates the same record. One of them should be removed.
LCB: Missing age/year. See plot; BM (14/03/2019) info sent using GitHub; TP: broken DOI; Time-scale missing; elevation estimated from Google Earth
LCB(29/03/2019): one record covers the entire last 2k. should be the primary; TP: broken DOI; site elevation estimated from Google Earth
LCB(29/03/2019): one record covers the entire last 2k. should be the primary; TP: broken DOI; site elevation estimated from Google Earth
LCB(29/03/2019): one record covers the entire last 2k. should be the primary; TP: broken DOI; site elevation estimated from Google Earth
JLC: The site name is Exuma Sound, which is different than TOTO (Tongue of the Ocean), based on map in Rosenheim paper (but labeled this way in NOAA Paleo). The lat and lon provided for site on NOAA paleo are different than what is here, and match paper more accurately. correct Lat: 23.67N correct Lon: 75.75W;    (additional notes) This record appears in th same paper as the Tongue of the Ocean sclerosponge record of Swart et al., 2002 and Rosenheim, 2005. The Sr/Ca data and calibration of that data appears in Rosenheim et al., 2004. The data from Swart 2002 had the chronology adjusted by Rosenheim 2005, do not Swart 2002 data in final version.
JLC: The Sr/Ca data are missing for this record, added to github;   (additional notes) This record appears in th same paper as the Tongue of the Ocean sclerosponge record of Swart et al., 2002 and Rosenheim, 2005. The Sr/Ca data and calibration of that data appears in Rosenheim, et al., 2004. The data from Swart 2002 had the chronology adjusted by Rosenheim 2005, do not Swart 2002 data in final
OCh-S: added; SM: Isotope interpretation direction shoule be positive
OCh-S: added
OCh-S: positive, added
TP (03/01/20): corrected the broken DOI (was missing a few dashes)
OCh-S: added
OCh-S: added
OCh-S: added; TP added elevation
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretation (P-negative) was removed from isotopeInterpretation2; OCh-S: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretation (P-negative) was removed from isotopeInterpretation2
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretation (P-negative) was removed from isotopeInterpretation2; OCh-S: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretation (RH-negative) was removed from isotopeInterpretation2
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretation (RH-negative) was removed from isotopeInterpretation2
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretation (RH-negative) was removed from isotopeInterpretation2
OCh-S:WEB3638db18 please replace to TR11SAHU00; OCh-S: Leaf water is correct
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretation (T_air-positive) was removed from isotopeInterpretation2
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: changed to P_E
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
OCh_S: Missing data are  desplayed in the graph 2 as continous line, while should be a gap (empty space)
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
TP: this is a derived average of all other trees from the site, with d18O values normalised to zero.
OCh-S: In 1 file has been presented 6 graphs, which were presented later on again. Either leave 1 file with 6 graphs, or present only 1 graph with own link. Label is desapeer 06, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05. Same graphs repeated 5 times with different links.
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3; OCh-S: added
TP: this is a derived average of all other trees from the site, with d18O values normalised to zero.
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretations (P-negative, T_air-positive) were removed from isotopeInterpretation2 and 3, ; OCh-S: changed; OCh-S:WEBa8749551 needs to be renamed to TR13SAWA00
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretation (T_air-positive) removed from isotopeInterpretation2
OCh-S: added
TP: added elevations; OCh-S: replaced soil water to soil, precipitation water; Changed Pub_1 DOI
TP: added elevations; OCh_S: replaced soil water to soil, precipitation water
TP: added elevations. OCh: z-score data, interpr. added
TP: added elevations; OCh: added
TP (31/12/19): climate interpretation (T_air-positive) removed from isotopeInterpretation3; isotopeInterp2 was incomplete and removed; OCh: replaced to P_E (precipitation_Evaporation, PDSI), Soil water replaced to Leaf water
OCh: replaced to P_E (precipitation_Evaporation, PDSI), Soil water replaced to Leaf water
OCh: replaced to P_E (precipitation_Evaporation, PDSI) Soil water replaced to Leaf water