adjusted lat and long from paper and checked on Google Earth.
adjusted lat and long from paper and checked on Google Earth.
adjusted lat and long from paper and checked on Google Earth.
adjusted lat and long from paper and checked on Google Earth.
Kilbourne 2004 has two paper that report on the same modern data
Kilbourne 2004 has two paper that report on the same modern data
Kilbourne 2004 has two paper that report on the same modern data
Kilbourne 2004 has two paper that report on the same modern data
This is a Sr/Ca paper, the d18O data is not reported in the paper so is it "peer reviewed" but just used for time assignment.  The data is on the Pangaea web site but not NOAA.
This is a Sr/Ca paper, the d18O data is not reported in the paper so is it "peer reviewed" but just used for time assignment.  The data is on the Pangaea web site but not NOAA.
This is a Sr/Ca paper, the d18O data is not reported in the paper so is it "peer reviewed" but just used for time assignment.  The data is on the Pangaea web site but not NOAA.
This is a Sr/Ca paper, the d18O data is not reported in the paper so is it "peer reviewed" but just used for time assignment.  The data is on the Pangaea web site but not NOAA.
Kilbourne 2007, 2008, and 2010 are all the same coral with radiocarbon 2007 and new coral in 2010 extending record to 1479.
Kilbourne 2007, 2008, and 2010 are all the same coral with radiocarbon 2007 and new coral in 2010 extending record to 1479.
Kilbourne 2007, 2008, and 2010 are all the same coral with radiocarbon 2007 and new coral in 2010 extending record to 1479.
This study used two cores from the same colony but give data for the colony only
This study used two cores from the same colony but give data for the colony only
This study used two cores from the same colony but give data for the colony only
Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W
Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W
Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W
possible duplicate with Quinn 2002, Stephans 2004 for 1992-1967 only DeLong 2012 has updated the chronology for Quinn 1998, updated d18O and d13C paper is in progress.
possible duplicate with Quinn 2002, Stephans 2004 for 1992-1967 only DeLong 2012 has updated the chronology for Quinn 1998, updated d18O and d13C paper is in progress.
possible duplicate with Quinn 2002, Stephans 2004 for 1992-1967 only DeLong 2012 has updated the chronology for Quinn 1998, updated d18O and d13C paper is in progress.
Cores cores from the same study and a previous study Swart 1996, Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W. paper mentions a d18O record for FB-6 that was in a Masters thesis but only Ba/Ca is on NOAA website
Cores cores from the same study and a previous study Swart 1996, Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W. paper mentions a d18O record for FB-6 that was in a Masters thesis but only Ba/Ca is on NOAA website
Cores cores from the same study and a previous study Swart 1996, Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W. paper mentions a d18O record for FB-6 that was in a Masters thesis but only Ba/Ca is on NOAA website
Cores cores from the same study and a previous study Swart 1996, Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W. paper mentions a d18O record for FB-6 that was in a Masters thesis but only Ba/Ca is on NOAA website
Cores cores from the same study and a previous study Swart 1996, Swart 1999 NOAA has different corrdinates for this coral 25 0N, 80 36W, Looking at Google earth and Hudsons map, the Swart 1999 corrdinates incorrect, they should be 24 degrees 55 minutes N, and ~80 degrees, 43.5 minutes W. paper mentions a d18O record for FB-6 that was in a Masters thesis but only Ba/Ca is on NOAA website
ngt03c93.2
ngt03c93.2
ngt14c93.2
ngt14c93.2
ngt14c93.2
ngt14c93.2
ngt14c93.2
ngt14c93.2
ngt27c94.2
ngt27c94.2
ngt37c95.2
ngt37c95.2
ngt37c95.2
ngt42C95.2
ngt42C95.2
ngt42C95.2
ngt42C95.2
ngt42C95.2
data in supplements of 10.1038/nature10581 and 10.5194/cp-10-1605-2014
data in supplements of 10.1038/nature10581 and 10.5194/cp-10-1605-2014
data in supplements of 10.1038/nature10581 and 10.5194/cp-10-1605-2014
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
chronology of this record updated according to IC11DILO01A
chronology of this record updated according to IC11DILO01A
chronology of this record updated according to IC11DILO01A
A77. 20 yr means
A77. 20 yr means
A77. 20 yr means
A79. 20 yr means
A79. 20 yr means
A79. 20 yr means
A84. 20 yr means
A84. 20 yr means
A84. 20 yr means
A87. 20 yr means
A87. 20 yr means
A87. 20 yr means
A79
A79
DYE3
DYE3
DYE3
NGRIP
NGRIP
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
20 yr means
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Annual
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
Summer
5 yr resolution
5 yr resolution
ngt06C93.2
ngt06C93.2
ngt06C93.2
ngt19C93.2
ngt19C93.2
ngt19C93.2
ngt19C93.2
ngt23C94.2
ngt23C94.2
ngt23C94.2
ngt23C94.2
ngt30C94.2
ngt30C94.2
ngt30C94.2
ngt30C94.2
ngt30C94.2
ngt33C94.2
ngt33C94.2
ngt33C94.2
ngt33C94.2
ngt33C94.2
ngt39C95.2
ngt39C95.2
ngt39C95.2
ngt39C95.2
ngt39C95.2
ngt39C95.3
ngt39C95.3
ngt39C95.3
ngt39C95.3
ngt39C95.3
ngt45C95.2
ngt45C95.2
ngt45C95.2
ngt45C95.2
ngt45C95.2
Z-level stack NGT-NGRIP (d18O H2O, normalized data)
Z-level stack NGT-NGRIP (d18O H2O, normalized data)
Z-level stack NGT-NGRIP (d18O H2O, normalized data)
summer
summer
summer
summer
summer
summer
annual averages
annual averages
annual averages
annual averages
annual averages
annual averages
A87
A87
A87
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
Core 1 annual Jan-Dec
100 year averages
100 year averages
100 year averages
no surface age
no surface age
no surface age
chronology in Russell et al 2003b; d18O data only between 1700 BP and 400 BP
chronology in Russell et al 2003b; d18O data only between 1700 BP and 400 BP
chronology in Russell et al 2003b; d18O data only between 1700 BP and 400 BP
ages derived from SOLOVIEVA and JONES, 2002 are 1996 AD and 8998 cal yr BP (-7048 AD)
ages derived from SOLOVIEVA and JONES, 2002 are 1996 AD and 8998 cal yr BP (-7048 AD)
ages derived from SOLOVIEVA and JONES, 2002 are 1996 AD and 8998 cal yr BP (-7048 AD)
Gastropods data used here, also ostracod and charphyte carbonate records which show the same trends.
Gastropods data used here, also ostracod and charphyte carbonate records which show the same trends.
Gastropods data used here, also ostracod and charphyte carbonate records which show the same trends.
Gastropods data used here, also ostracod and charphyte carbonate records which show the same trends.
Gastropods data used here, also ostracod and charphyte carbonate records which show the same trends.
Gastropods data used here, also ostracod and charphyte carbonate records which show the same trends.
Gastropods data used here, also ostracod and charphyte carbonate records which show the same trends.
Gastropods data used here, also ostracod and charphyte carbonate records which show the same trends.
Gastropods data used here, also ostracod and charphyte carbonate records which show the same trends.
see aslo Dean et al in press 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.004; Jones et al., 2005 10.1007/s10933-005-6743-0
see aslo Dean et al in press 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.004; Jones et al., 2005 10.1007/s10933-005-6743-0
see aslo Dean et al in press 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.004; Jones et al., 2005 10.1007/s10933-005-6743-0
Possible question re modern day age constraint
Possible question re modern day age constraint
Possible question re modern day age constraint
Age model based on tie points to Laguna Verdes Alta
Age model based on tie points to Laguna Verdes Alta
Age model based on tie points to Laguna Verdes Alta
Just accepted as age model based on age nearish to 1AD i.e. 2600 BP
Just accepted as age model based on age nearish to 1AD i.e. 2600 BP
Just accepted as age model based on age nearish to 1AD i.e. 2600 BP
no radiometric ages for surface sediments prior to 1440 AD
no radiometric ages for surface sediments prior to 1440 AD
no radiometric ages for surface sediments prior to 1440 AD
I just moved this from the Rejected list - not sure why it was there and not here? Data also published in Yan et al 2011 (Nat Comms) and data on NOAA from that paper, but from what I can tell, isotope data are same as in 2008 paper
I just moved this from the Rejected list - not sure why it was there and not here? Data also published in Yan et al 2011 (Nat Comms) and data on NOAA from that paper, but from what I can tell, isotope data are same as in 2008 paper
I just moved this from the Rejected list - not sure why it was there and not here? Data also published in Yan et al 2011 (Nat Comms) and data on NOAA from that paper, but from what I can tell, isotope data are same as in 2008 paper
Age model in Ekdahl et al. (2008)
Age model in Ekdahl et al. (2008)
Age model in Ekdahl et al. (2008)
hiatus between 11760 and 7560 BP
hiatus between 11760 and 7560 BP
hiatus between 11760 and 7560 BP
See also Martin-Puertas et al 2008 for chronology
See also Martin-Puertas et al 2008 for chronology
See also Martin-Puertas et al 2008 for chronology
Constrained by 11 14C dates + correlated tephra deposits
Constrained by 11 14C dates + correlated tephra deposits
Strong influence of groundwater from multiple aquifers
Strong influence of groundwater from multiple aquifers
Strong influence of groundwater from multiple aquifers
carbonate d18O in older part of the record co-vary with cellulose data
carbonate d18O in older part of the record co-vary with cellulose data
carbonate d18O in older part of the record co-vary with cellulose data
Chronology in Hammarlund, Dan, et al. "Palaeolimnological and sedimentary responses to Holocene forest retreat in the Scandes Mountains, west-central Sweden." The Holocene 14.6 (2004): 862-876.
Chronology in Hammarlund, Dan, et al. "Palaeolimnological and sedimentary responses to Holocene forest retreat in the Scandes Mountains, west-central Sweden." The Holocene 14.6 (2004): 862-876.
Chronology in Hammarlund, Dan, et al. "Palaeolimnological and sedimentary responses to Holocene forest retreat in the Scandes Mountains, west-central Sweden." The Holocene 14.6 (2004): 862-876.
Chronology established using 210Pb and 137Cs. Ages and sedimentation rates were calculated using a CRS model assuming a constant rate of supply of 210Pb to the sediment according to Appleby and Oldfield (1978).
Chronology established using 210Pb and 137Cs. Ages and sedimentation rates were calculated using a CRS model assuming a constant rate of supply of 210Pb to the sediment according to Appleby and Oldfield (1978).
Chronology established using 210Pb and 137Cs. Ages and sedimentation rates were calculated using a CRS model assuming a constant rate of supply of 210Pb to the sediment according to Appleby and Oldfield (1978).
Age model based on 14C dates
Age model based on 14C dates
Age model based on 14C dates
See Verschuren et al 2009 for chronology
See Verschuren et al 2009 for chronology
See Verschuren et al 2009 for chronology
also Bird et al. (2011b) - http://www.pnas.org/content/108/21/8583.abstract
also Bird et al. (2011b) - http://www.pnas.org/content/108/21/8583.abstract
also Bird et al. (2011b) - http://www.pnas.org/content/108/21/8583.abstract
chronology in Ssemmanda et al 2005
chronology in Ssemmanda et al 2005
chronology in Ssemmanda et al 2005
Notes to isotope interpretation parameter 1: (1) Zonal wind speed is implied to impact both rainfall amounts and moisture source, though not explicitly stated. (2) Note that zonal wind speeds in the paper refer to easterly (onshore) transport, opposite of the conventional "u wind" parameter where stronger u = stronger westerly wind.
Notes to isotope interpretation parameter 1: (1) Zonal wind speed is implied to impact both rainfall amounts and moisture source, though not explicitly stated. (2) Note that zonal wind speeds in the paper refer to easterly (onshore) transport, opposite of the conventional "u wind" parameter where stronger u = stronger westerly wind.
Notes to isotope interpretation parameter 1: (1) Zonal wind speed is implied to impact both rainfall amounts and moisture source, though not explicitly stated. (2) Note that zonal wind speeds in the paper refer to easterly (onshore) transport, opposite of the conventional "u wind" parameter where stronger u = stronger westerly wind.
I just moved this from the Rejected list  not sure why it was there and not herepermil Age model An et al. (2012)
I just moved this from the Rejected list  not sure why it was there and not herepermil Age model An et al. (2012)
I just moved this from the Rejected list  not sure why it was there and not herepermil Age model An et al. (2012)
Methodology detail at ftp://rock.geosociety.org/pub/reposit/2013/2013037.pdf
Methodology detail at ftp://rock.geosociety.org/pub/reposit/2013/2013037.pdf
Methodology detail at ftp://rock.geosociety.org/pub/reposit/2013/2013037.pdf
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
Of all the homologues presented in this study, C28 is used for paleoclimate interpretation: "Of all the homologues (Fig. 7a), C26 and C28 showed the most coherent and reliable evidence for terrigenous vegetation sources downcore, and we relied on C28 for paleoclimate reconstruction as before (Feakins et al., 2012)."
14C ages and Pb/Cs analysis
14C ages and Pb/Cs analysis
14C ages and Pb/Cs analysis
Oxcal (Bronk Ramsey 1999, 2008; Blockley et al., 2008)
Oxcal (Bronk Ramsey 1999, 2008; Blockley et al., 2008)
Oxcal (Bronk Ramsey 1999, 2008; Blockley et al., 2008)
Age vs depth model after Laskar et al. (2004)
Age vs depth model after Laskar et al. (2004)
Age vs depth model after Laskar et al. (2004)
Core H12
Core H12
Core H12
Core H12
Core H12
Core H12
14C dates calibrated using Intcal09 curve (Heaton et al., 2009; Reimer et al., 2009)
14C dates calibrated using Intcal09 curve (Heaton et al., 2009; Reimer et al., 2009)
14C dates calibrated using Intcal09 curve (Heaton et al., 2009; Reimer et al., 2009)
C26 nalkanoic acids
C26 nalkanoic acids
C26 nalkanoic acids
C26 nalkanoic acids
C26 nalkanoic acids
C26 nalkanoic acids
C26 nalkanoic acids
C26 nalkanoic acids
C26 nalkanoic acids
C26 nalkanoic acids
Age model based on 6 14C ages and correlated (see Wagner et al 2012)
Age model based on 6 14C ages and correlated (see Wagner et al 2012)
Age model based on 6 14C ages and correlated (see Wagner et al 2012)
Very little info on anlaysis or interpretation of d18O
Very little info on anlaysis or interpretation of d18O
Very little info on anlaysis or interpretation of d18O
Higher resolution data availabel from Yuan et al 2014
Higher resolution data availabel from Yuan et al 2014
Higher resolution data availabel from Yuan et al 2014
Core AS TMAX; Only ~200 years from varves
Core AS TMAX; Only ~200 years from varves
Core AS TMAX; Only ~200 years from varves
One gastropod species data used here, also another gastropod species and ostracod records which show the same trends.
One gastropod species data used here, also another gastropod species and ostracod records which show the same trends.
One gastropod species data used here, also another gastropod species and ostracod records which show the same trends.
One ostracod species used here but other shell typrsd show similar trends with values offset with a smaller range
One ostracod species used here but other shell typrsd show similar trends with values offset with a smaller range
One ostracod species used here but other shell typrsd show similar trends with values offset with a smaller range
One ostracod species used here but other shell typrsd show similar trends with values offset with a smaller range
One ostracod species used here but other shell typrsd show similar trends with values offset with a smaller range
d18Osw not estimated yet, but can be estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca. LJ: dont fully understand how they have derived the d18Osw estimates
d18Osw not estimated yet, but can be estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca. LJ: dont fully understand how they have derived the d18Osw estimates
d18Osw not estimated yet, but can be estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca. LJ: dont fully understand how they have derived the d18Osw estimates
d18Osw not estimated yet, but can be estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca. LJ: dont fully understand how they have derived the d18Osw estimates
d18Osw not estimated yet, but can be estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca. LJ: dont fully understand how they have derived the d18Osw estimates
d18Osw not estimated yet, but can be estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca. LJ: dont fully understand how they have derived the d18Osw estimates
d18Osw not estimated yet, but can be estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca. LJ: dont fully understand how they have derived the d18Osw estimates
d18Osw not estimated yet, but can be estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca. LJ: dont fully understand how they have derived the d18Osw estimates
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -0.5 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -0.5 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -0.5 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -0.5 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -0.5 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -0.5 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -0.5 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -0.5 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -0.5 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
spliced record of JM97-948/2A and MD95-2011
spliced record of JM97-948/2A and MD95-2011
spliced record of JM97-948/2A and MD95-2011
spliced record of JM97-948/2A and MD95-2011
spliced record of JM97-948/2A and MD95-2011
d18Osw can be estimated, but authors chose not to do this because of depth and season habitat differences between d18O and ALK SST. multiple species of planktic foraminifera and SST estimates (Mg/Ca and alkenones, Alk was taken in Ocean2k)
d18Osw can be estimated, but authors chose not to do this because of depth and season habitat differences between d18O and ALK SST. multiple species of planktic foraminifera and SST estimates (Mg/Ca and alkenones, Alk was taken in Ocean2k)
d18Osw can be estimated, but authors chose not to do this because of depth and season habitat differences between d18O and ALK SST. multiple species of planktic foraminifera and SST estimates (Mg/Ca and alkenones, Alk was taken in Ocean2k)
d18Osw can be estimated, but authors chose not to do this because of depth and season habitat differences between d18O and ALK SST. multiple species of planktic foraminifera and SST estimates (Mg/Ca and alkenones, Alk was taken in Ocean2k)
d18Osw can be estimated, but authors chose not to do this because of depth and season habitat differences between d18O and ALK SST. multiple species of planktic foraminifera and SST estimates (Mg/Ca and alkenones, Alk was taken in Ocean2k)
spliced record, Mg/Ca data available for box core, but authors did not calculate d18Osw
spliced record, Mg/Ca data available for box core, but authors did not calculate d18Osw
spliced record, Mg/Ca data available for box core, but authors did not calculate d18Osw
spliced record, Mg/Ca data available for box core, but authors did not calculate d18Osw
spliced record, Mg/Ca data available for box core, but authors did not calculate d18Osw
only 2 age control points, not in O2kLR. Excludepermil SST available from UK37:d18Osw not added
only 2 age control points, not in O2kLR. Excludepermil SST available from UK37:d18Osw not added
only 2 age control points, not in O2kLR. Excludepermil SST available from UK37:d18Osw not added
only 2 age control points, not in O2kLR. Excludepermil SST available from UK37:d18Osw not added
only 2 age control points, not in O2kLR. Excludepermil SST available from UK37:d18Osw not added
WARNING. Documentation is extremely poor for this record. d18Osw has to be estimated, multiple species of planktic foraminifera and SST estimates (MAT and alkenones, alk was taken in Ocean2k)
WARNING. Documentation is extremely poor for this record. d18Osw has to be estimated, multiple species of planktic foraminifera and SST estimates (MAT and alkenones, alk was taken in Ocean2k)
WARNING. Documentation is extremely poor for this record. d18Osw has to be estimated, multiple species of planktic foraminifera and SST estimates (MAT and alkenones, alk was taken in Ocean2k)
WARNING. Documentation is extremely poor for this record. d18Osw has to be estimated, multiple species of planktic foraminifera and SST estimates (MAT and alkenones, alk was taken in Ocean2k)
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
WARNING: d18Of measurements probably affected by cushing. 0.2 permil should be added. in the archived data, extra results with different levels of smoothing of sw d18O
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
dD on total alkenones
dD on total alkenones
dD on total alkenones
dD on total alkenones
dD on total alkenones
dD on total alkenones
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
d18Osw not estimated yet
using d18O ruber, data partly presented previously in Super ENSO and Global Climate Oscillations at Millennial Time Scales Lowell Stott1,*, Christopher Poulsen1, Steve Lund1, Robert Thunell2 Science  12 Jul 2002: Vol. 297, Issue 5579, pp. 222-226 DOI: 10.1126/science.1071627
using d18O ruber, data partly presented previously in Super ENSO and Global Climate Oscillations at Millennial Time Scales Lowell Stott1,*, Christopher Poulsen1, Steve Lund1, Robert Thunell2 Science  12 Jul 2002: Vol. 297, Issue 5579, pp. 222-226 DOI: 10.1126/science.1071627
using d18O ruber, data partly presented previously in Super ENSO and Global Climate Oscillations at Millennial Time Scales Lowell Stott1,*, Christopher Poulsen1, Steve Lund1, Robert Thunell2 Science  12 Jul 2002: Vol. 297, Issue 5579, pp. 222-226 DOI: 10.1126/science.1071627
using d18O ruber, data partly presented previously in Super ENSO and Global Climate Oscillations at Millennial Time Scales Lowell Stott1,*, Christopher Poulsen1, Steve Lund1, Robert Thunell2 Science  12 Jul 2002: Vol. 297, Issue 5579, pp. 222-226 DOI: 10.1126/science.1071627
using d18O ruber, data partly presented previously in Super ENSO and Global Climate Oscillations at Millennial Time Scales Lowell Stott1,*, Christopher Poulsen1, Steve Lund1, Robert Thunell2 Science  12 Jul 2002: Vol. 297, Issue 5579, pp. 222-226 DOI: 10.1126/science.1071627
using d18O ruber, data partly presented previously in Super ENSO and Global Climate Oscillations at Millennial Time Scales Lowell Stott1,*, Christopher Poulsen1, Steve Lund1, Robert Thunell2 Science  12 Jul 2002: Vol. 297, Issue 5579, pp. 222-226 DOI: 10.1126/science.1071627
using d18O ruber, data partly presented previously in Super ENSO and Global Climate Oscillations at Millennial Time Scales Lowell Stott1,*, Christopher Poulsen1, Steve Lund1, Robert Thunell2 Science  12 Jul 2002: Vol. 297, Issue 5579, pp. 222-226 DOI: 10.1126/science.1071627
using d18O ruber, data partly presented previously in Super ENSO and Global Climate Oscillations at Millennial Time Scales Lowell Stott1,*, Christopher Poulsen1, Steve Lund1, Robert Thunell2 Science  12 Jul 2002: Vol. 297, Issue 5579, pp. 222-226 DOI: 10.1126/science.1071627
using d18O ruber, data partly presented previously in Super ENSO and Global Climate Oscillations at Millennial Time Scales Lowell Stott1,*, Christopher Poulsen1, Steve Lund1, Robert Thunell2 Science  12 Jul 2002: Vol. 297, Issue 5579, pp. 222-226 DOI: 10.1126/science.1071627
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -1.0 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -1.0 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -1.0 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -1.0 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -1.0 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -1.0 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -1.0 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: no d18Osw in data set. Need to recalculate. Authors adjusted SST by -1.0 deg to correct for depth difference. SSS estimated with d18Osw, d18sw estimated using alkenones, NOT Mg/Ca, N pachy (d) used
WARNING: duplicate of MS07RCSNA02. Kept MS07RCSNA02 because properly filled out
WARNING: duplicate of MS07RCSNA02. Kept MS07RCSNA02 because properly filled out
WARNING: duplicate of MS07RCSNA02. Kept MS07RCSNA02 because properly filled out
WARNING: duplicate of MS07RCSNA02. Kept MS07RCSNA02 because properly filled out
WARNING: duplicate of MS07RCSNA02. Kept MS07RCSNA02 because properly filled out
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
not clear which paleotemperature eq use. Bemis 1998 presents several
data presented in peer reviewed publication, sparse methods in thesis: due to influence of tsunami deposits the interval 51–140 cm might well be disturbed and the interval 140–248 cm should be interpreted carefully, especially above 198 cm
data presented in peer reviewed publication, sparse methods in thesis: due to influence of tsunami deposits the interval 51–140 cm might well be disturbed and the interval 140–248 cm should be interpreted carefully, especially above 198 cm
data presented in peer reviewed publication, sparse methods in thesis: due to influence of tsunami deposits the interval 51–140 cm might well be disturbed and the interval 140–248 cm should be interpreted carefully, especially above 198 cm
composite record of several cores
composite record of several cores
composite record of several cores
composite record of several cores
composite record of several cores
composite record of several cores
composite record of several cores
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
2 dates, 2ka
absolutely dated (tephra) subdecal resolution
absolutely dated (tephra) subdecal resolution
absolutely dated (tephra) subdecal resolution
dD of C30 fatty acid. Different entries correspond to 2 diff cores from same site, 31MC (upper core) and 34GGC (deeper core). * NOTE: Earliest/Most recent year is in CE
dD of C30 fatty acid. Different entries correspond to 2 diff cores from same site, 31MC (upper core) and 34GGC (deeper core). * NOTE: Earliest/Most recent year is in CE
dD of C30 fatty acid. Different entries correspond to 2 diff cores from same site, 31MC (upper core) and 34GGC (deeper core). * NOTE: Earliest/Most recent year is in CE
dD of C30 fatty acid. Different entries correspond to 2 diff cores from same site, 31MC (upper core) and 34GGC (deeper core). * NOTE: Earliest/Most recent year is in CE
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database. Not clear which paleotemperature equation used: Bemis et al 1998 contains several.
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database. Not clear which paleotemperature equation used: Bemis et al 1998 contains several.
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database. Not clear which paleotemperature equation used: Bemis et al 1998 contains several.
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database. Not clear which paleotemperature equation used: Bemis et al 1998 contains several.
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database. Not clear which paleotemperature equation used: Bemis et al 1998 contains several.
d18Osw not estimated yet, and age model should be retrieved from the Ocean2k SST database. Not clear which paleotemperature equation used: Bemis et al 1998 contains several.
LJ: added original data on depth scale
LJ: added original data on depth scale
LJ: added original data on depth scale
LJ: added original data on depth scale
LJ: added original data on depth scale
LJ: added original data on depth scale
LJ: added original data on depth scale
LJ: added original data on depth scale
LJ added raw data, not binned data as in O2K
LJ added raw data, not binned data as in O2K
LJ added raw data, not binned data as in O2K
LJ added raw data, not binned data as in O2K
LJ added raw data, not binned data as in O2K
LJ added raw data, not binned data as in O2K
LJ added raw data, not binned data as in O2K
LJ added raw data, not binned data as in O2K
LJ: not linked with SST data since authors dont derive d18Osw
LJ: not linked with SST data since authors dont derive d18Osw
LJ: not linked with SST data since authors dont derive d18Osw
LJ: not linked with SST data since authors dont derive d18Osw
LJ: not linked with SST data since authors dont derive d18Osw
LJ: not linked with SST data since authors dont derive d18Osw
LJ: not linked with SST data since authors dont derive d18Osw
Individual Foraminifera Analysis, d18O values are averages for each depth analysed; age model unclear. There seems to be a reversal around 12 cm in the core, but this is not taken into account
Individual Foraminifera Analysis, d18O values are averages for each depth analysed; age model unclear. There seems to be a reversal around 12 cm in the core, but this is not taken into account
Individual Foraminifera Analysis, d18O values are averages for each depth analysed; age model unclear. There seems to be a reversal around 12 cm in the core, but this is not taken into account
Individual Foraminifera Analysis, d18O values are averages for each depth analysed; age model unclear. There seems to be a reversal around 12 cm in the core, but this is not taken into account
Individual Foraminifera Analysis, d18O values are averages for each depth analysed; age model unclear. There seems to be a reversal around 12 cm in the core, but this is not taken into account
Individual Foraminifera Analysis, d18O values are averages for each depth analysed; age model unclear. There seems to be a reversal around 12 cm in the core, but this is not taken into account
SST data available, but no d18Osw, can of course be calculated
SST data available, but no d18Osw, can of course be calculated
SST data available, but no d18Osw, can of course be calculated
spliced record. Decadal resolution; >20 14C dates
spliced record. Decadal resolution; >20 14C dates
spliced record. Decadal resolution; >20 14C dates
spliced record. Decadal resolution; >20 14C dates
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, alk (used for SST in ocean2k) and Mg/Ca on bulloides are available, Mg/Ca should be used. These are actually two parallel records! Poor documentation, no information how d18O was measured or how d18Osw was estimated. The initial entry contained some info on instrument (MAT 252) and precision (0.08) and paleotemp eq (Shackleton), but LJ cant find it in the paper (Shackleton is not even cited). Who filled this out?
d18Osw not estimated yet, also data for P. obliquiloculata, but not on pangaea
d18Osw not estimated yet, also data for P. obliquiloculata, but not on pangaea
d18Osw not estimated yet, also data for P. obliquiloculata, but not on pangaea
d18Osw not estimated yet, also data for P. obliquiloculata, but not on pangaea
d18Osw not estimated yet, also data for P. obliquiloculata, but not on pangaea
d18Osw not estimated yet, also data for P. obliquiloculata, but not on pangaea
SST data available, but no d18Osw, can of course be calculated
SST data available, but no d18Osw, can of course be calculated
SST data available, but no d18Osw, can of course be calculated
SST data available, but no d18Osw, can of course be calculated
spliced record, lower res SST from faunal assemblages available
spliced record, lower res SST from faunal assemblages available
spliced record, lower res SST from faunal assemblages available
spliced record, lower res SST from faunal assemblages available
spliced record, lower res SST from faunal assemblages available
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
splice of GeoB6211-1 and GeoB6211-2, age model is after Voigt et al. Needs updating to account for higher resolution of Chiessi
GeoB6308
GeoB6308
GeoB6308
record contains two subcores from same box core; in the paper theyve been aligned using CaCO3 and 14C
record contains two subcores from same box core; in the paper theyve been aligned using CaCO3 and 14C
record contains two subcores from same box core; in the paper theyve been aligned using CaCO3 and 14C
record contains two subcores from same box core; in the paper theyve been aligned using CaCO3 and 14C
record contains two subcores from same box core; in the paper theyve been aligned using CaCO3 and 14C
record contains two subcores from same box core; in the paper theyve been aligned using CaCO3 and 14C
youngest date @ 0.8 ka
youngest date @ 0.8 ka
youngest date @ 0.8 ka
youngest date @ 0.8 ka
youngest date @ 0.8 ka
youngest date @ 0.8 ka
Haase-Schramm 2005, they sample the time interval from 1620 to 1745 A.D. with almost monthly resolution. Bohm 2002 also looks at this sponge but reports d13C.
Haase-Schramm 2005, they sample the time interval from 1620 to 1745 A.D. with almost monthly resolution. Bohm 2002 also looks at this sponge but reports d13C.
Haase-Schramm 2005, they sample the time interval from 1620 to 1745 A.D. with almost monthly resolution. Bohm 2002 also looks at this sponge but reports d13C.
Haase-Schramm 2005, they sample the time interval from 1620 to 1745 A.D. with almost monthly resolution. Bohm 2002 also looks at this sponge but reports d13C.
Haase-Schramm 2005, they sample the time interval from 1620 to 1745 A.D. with almost monthly resolution. Bohm 2002 also looks at this sponge but reports d13C.
Haase-Schramm 2005, they sample the time interval from 1620 to 1745 A.D. with almost monthly resolution. Bohm 2002 also looks at this sponge but reports d13C.
Haase-Schramm 2005, they sample the time interval from 1620 to 1745 A.D. with almost monthly resolution. Bohm 2002 also looks at this sponge but reports d13C.
Haase-Schramm 2005, they sample the time interval from 1620 to 1745 A.D. with almost monthly resolution. Bohm 2002 also looks at this sponge but reports d13C.
Age Model: +/- 5
Age Model: +/- 5
Age Model: +/- 5