temperature (R1jYCQVBlaV): paleoData_notes: 'In looking at the data a bit more closely, I see that there is quite a big difference between our reconstructed July temperatre near the top of the core (~5.7 C) and observed temperatre (9.2 C, based on an earlier publication, and ~12 C, based on the website link you sent. This offset is large and it may be because our modern training set is biased toward more northern (and hence colder) samples. In this regard I think the reconstruction may be systematically too cold, but the relative changes are probably reliable. Perhaps anomalies should be calculated?' has been replaced by ''
temperature (R1jYCQVBlaV): paleoData_proxyDetail: 'assemblage' has been replaced by 'In looking at the data a bit more closely, I see that there is quite a big difference between our reconstructed July temperatre near the top of the core (~5.7 C) and observed temperatre (9.2 C, based on an earlier publication, and ~12 C, based on the website link you sent. This offset is large and it may be because our modern training set is biased toward more northern (and hence colder) samples. In this regard I think the reconstruction may be systematically too cold, but the relative changes are probably reliable. Perhaps anomalies should be calculated?'
ReliabIeYN1 (R4TIJKiJWaN): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'
OriginalSampleID (RafWeO8JxpE): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'
uncertaintyHigh (Rb0OohUFnMe): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'
uncertaintyLow (RQKKoSfS16V): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'

temperature (R1jYCQVBlaV): paleoData_notes: 'In looking at the data a bit more closely, I see that there is quite a big difference between our reconstructed July temperatre near the top of the core (~5.7 C) and observed temperatre (9.2 C, based on an earlier publication, and ~12 C, based on the website link you sent. This offset is large and it may be because our modern training set is biased toward more northern (and hence colder) samples. In this regard I think the reconstruction may be systematically too cold, but the relative changes are probably reliable. Perhaps anomalies should be calculated?' has been replaced by ''
temperature (R1jYCQVBlaV): paleoData_proxyDetail: 'assemblage' has been replaced by 'In looking at the data a bit more closely, I see that there is quite a big difference between our reconstructed July temperatre near the top of the core (~5.7 C) and observed temperatre (9.2 C, based on an earlier publication, and ~12 C, based on the website link you sent. This offset is large and it may be because our modern training set is biased toward more northern (and hence colder) samples. In this regard I think the reconstruction may be systematically too cold, but the relative changes are probably reliable. Perhaps anomalies should be calculated?'
ReliabIeYN1 (R4TIJKiJWaN): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'
OriginalSampleID (RafWeO8JxpE): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'
uncertaintyHigh (Rb0OohUFnMe): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'
uncertaintyLow (RQKKoSfS16V): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'