Ciais, P; Petit, J R; Jouzel, J; Lorius, C; Barkov, N I; Lipenkov, V; Nicola  ev, V

Evidence for an early Holocene climatic optimum in the Antarctic deep ice-core record

Holocene temperature variations inferred from Antarctic ice cores

Holocene Climate Variability in Antarctica Based on 11 Ice-Core Isotopic Records

age gap of 3.4 ka, retained to fill low-latitude gap

ReliabIeYN1 (RiL1gsiojQF): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'
uncertaintyLow (RqvtfgGJP0F): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'
uncertaintyHigh (RtfEVRnt9H2): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'pollen'
temperature (RyQ74Z7GxTJ): paleoData_proxyDetail: 'assemblage' has been replaced by ''

Herzschuh, Ulrike; Kramer, Annette; Mischke, Steffen; Zhang, Chengjun

Quantitative climate and vegetation trends since the late glacial on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau deduced from Koucha Lake pollen spectra

temperature (PYTRUXBRWZ0): paleoData_proxyDetail: 'assemblage' has been replaced by ''

ReliabIeYN1 (R6oVC6PngSg): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'chironomid'
ReliabIeYN2 (RGN9d8gTktU): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'chironomid'
temperature (RGx72to7BAg): paleoData_proxyDetail: 'assemblage' has been replaced by ''
uncertaintyHigh (RLgKDyuDGWv): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'chironomid'
uncertaintyLow (RRNw8DYzLBt): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'chironomid'
uncertaintyLow (Rtg7SYrVOvY): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'chironomid'
uncertaintyHigh (RUUWJV1ko6P): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'chironomid'
temperature (RXGw2dCgVOx): paleoData_proxyGeneral: '' has been replaced by 'chironomid'

Postglacial environmental history of western Victoria Island, Canadian Arctic

The age-depth model was done using a linear-interpolation between calibrated dates in Microsoft Excel, and so we do not have AgeYound or AgeOld estimates like we would have if it had been done in CLAM or BACON.

In looking at the data a bit more closely, I see that there is quite a big difference between our reconstructed July temperatre near the top of the core (~5.7 C) and observed temperatre (9.2 C, based on an earlier publication, and ~12 C, based on the website link you sent. This offset is large and it may be because our modern training set is biased toward more northern (and hence colder) samples. In this regard I think the reconstruction may be systematically too cold, but the relative changes are probably reliable. Perhaps anomalies should be calculated?