BaCa (GBRCD.LE05MAG01.BaCa): interpretation1_scope: '' has been replaced by 'climate'
MgCa (GBRCD.LE05MAG01.MgCa): interpretation1_scope: '' has been replaced by 'climate'
Mn (GBRCD.LE05MAG01.Mn): interpretation1_scope: '' has been replaced by 'climate'
SrCa (GBRCD.LE05MAG01.SrCa): interpretation1_scope: '' has been replaced by 'climate'
d13C (GBRCD.LE05MAG01.d13C): interpretation1_scope: '' has been replaced by 'climate'
d18O (GBRCD.LE05MAG01.d18O): interpretation1_scope: '' has been replaced by 'climate'
d18Osw (GBRCD.LE05MAG01.d18Osw): interpretation1_scope: '' has been replaced by 'climate'

Barnes and Lough (1992); D'Olivo and McCulloch (2022); De'ath et al. (2009); Erler et al. (2016); Lewis et al. (2007); Lough (2007); Lough (2011a); Lough (2011b); Lough and Barnes (1997)

Thought to be the same coral head later sampled by AIMS as GFB31.

Lewis, S.E. (2005), 'Environmental Trends in GBR lagoon and Burdekin River catchment during the mid-Holocene and since European settlement using Porites coral records, Magnetic Island, QLD', PhD Thesis, James Cook University.

Environmental Trends in GBR lagoon and Burdekin River catchment during the mid-Holocene and since European settlement using Porites coral records, Magnetic Island, QLD

Latitude and longitude matched to other records with the same core ID. GPS coordinates plot the core on Magnetic Island. Higher resolution GPS coordinates for latitude and longitude of GFB31 coral head are -19.155083, 146.866167.

Range 0.06-3.18 cm/year; calculated between density troughs.

U-Th and growth bands. Relative chronology started at minimum year 5 and ends at maximum year 130 and assigned appropriate calendar age (BCE) for archiving. Note observed growth hiatus attributed to -3868 to -3874 CE (year 68 to 74 as per Lough et al. (2014)).

5.790 ± 0.031 ka reported 2003-09 for top of NEL01D and 6.089 ± 0.040 ka reported 2003-09 for bottom of NEL01D. Additional dating information provided in Lewis (2005). Original age discrepancy compared with published Lough et al. (2014) 14C dating becomes within error using re-calibration of 14C ages. Assumed this NEL01D youngest year (year 130) matches LO14NEL04 youngest year (Lough et al. (2014) year 0).