Composite of three cores: PG01-A-2, TN99-A-4, TM01-A-10.
monthly correlations not reported, instead used IOD season
Note: Length of coral record increased for Abram et al., 2020 publication relative to Abram et al., 2015
Note: Chronology of coral updated for Abram et al., 2020 publication relative to Gagan et al., 2015
Fossil Coral
Fossil Coral
Fossil Coral
Fossil Coral
Fossil Coral
Fossil Coral
Fossil Coral
Study focuses on use of Sr/U rather than Sr/Ca
Study focuses on use of Sr/U rather than Sr/Ca
Study focuses on use of Sr/U rather than Sr/Ca
Study focuses on use of Sr/U rather than Sr/Ca
Study focuses on use of Sr/U rather than Sr/Ca
Study focuses on use of Sr/U rather than Sr/Ca
A composite of cores TN and BB (CoralHydro2k ID BO14HTI02) was used from 2010-1977 for the published reconstructions in Bolton et al. 2014 and Goodkin et al. 2021.
A composite of cores TN and BB (CoralHydro2k ID BO14HTI02) was used from 2010-1977 for the published reconstructions in Bolton et al. 2014 and Goodkin et al. 2021.
A composite of cores TN and BB (CoralHydro2k ID BO14HTI02) was used from 2010-1977 for the published reconstructions in Bolton et al. 2014 and Goodkin et al. 2021.
A composite of cores TN (CoralHydro2k ID BO14HTI01) and BB was used from 2010-1977 for the published reconstructions in Bolton et al. 2014 and Goodkin et al. 2021.
A composite of cores TN (CoralHydro2k ID BO14HTI01) and BB was used from 2010-1977 for the published reconstructions in Bolton et al. 2014 and Goodkin et al. 2021.
7 calibration equations are available in Boiseau et al. 1998 (this database contains Equation (1) information)
used published values (i.e., not locally derived) for Sr/Ca-SST and d18O-SST slopes
used published values (i.e., not locally derived) for Sr/Ca-SST and d18O-SST slopes
used published values (i.e., not locally derived) for Sr/Ca-SST and d18O-SST slopes
This paper did not calibrate the d18O proxy or reconstruct temperature. It instead analyzed variability through time by directly using the d18O proxy.
This paper did not calibrate the d18O proxy or reconstruct temperature. It instead analyzed variability through time by directly using the d18O proxy.
Microatoll; coral rubble samples; data reported in Supplements of paper
Microatoll; coral rubble samples; data reported in Supplements of paper
slope is not calculated, reported slope from Weber and Woodhead is used of -0.24
Extra information supplied that is not included in publication such as higher precision slope value. Noted as exposed to open ocean; seasonally influenced by river discharge
monthly correlations not reported
One core, this record: younger part of core MAF00-01 at monthly resolution (1896-1998);  annual correlation based on 1897-1997 data
One core, this record: older part of core MAF00-01 at bimonthly resolution (1622-1722)
Sr/Ca are average values of three colonies and replicate paths
Same colony as 08PS-A1, but different core and core top age
Same colony as 08PS-A2, but different core and core top age
Study focuses on use of Sr/U rather than Sr/Ca; multiple locations Atlantic and Pacific; Sr/Ca uncertainty 1 deg C; Sr-U uncertainty 0.5 deg C; Sr/Ca-SST slope not indicated
Study uses multiple cores from multiple locations in the Great Barrier Reef; spans 15-18S latitude; multiple Sr/Ca regression equations in the paper. Supplemnet has all data.
regressions in paper use air temps instead of SST, relevant growth information about coral found in PhD thesis (http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-ep000102521)
regressions in paper use air temps instead of SST, relevant growth information about coral found in PhD thesis (http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-ep000102521)
This is a refinement of the record available previously (Druffel and Griffin, JGR 1993) which showed biennial d18O for the period 1635-1957.
This is a refinement of the record available previously (Druffel and Griffin, JGR 1993) which showed biennial d18O for the period 1635-1957.
Core was collected in a subhorizontal, not vertical, orientation from coral colony; indistinct growth banding in top 50 years of core
Core was collected in a subhorizontal, not vertical, orientation from coral colony; indistinct growth banding in top 50 years of core
Annual regression slopes (-0.213 / C, -0.140 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
Annual regression slopes (-0.213 / C, -0.140 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
Annual regression slopes (-0.213 / C, -0.140 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
Annual regression slopes (-0.213 / C, -0.140 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
Annual regression slopes (-0.213 / C, -0.140 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
Annual regression slopes (-0.29 / C, -0.115 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
Annual regression slopes (-0.29 / C, -0.115 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
Annual regression slopes (-0.29 / C, -0.115 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
Annual regression slopes (-0.29 / C, -0.115 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
Annual regression slopes (-0.29 / C, -0.115 mmol/mol / C) imply an apparent amplification of inferred SST variations on interannual and longer timescales.
See Goodkin et al 2005 for interannual Sr/Ca calibration
See Goodkin et al 2005 for interannual Sr/Ca calibration
See Goodkin et al 2005 for interannual Sr/Ca calibration
See Goodkin et al 2005 for interannual Sr/Ca calibration
See Goodkin et al 2005 for interannual Sr/Ca calibration
See Goodkin et al 2005 for interannual Sr/Ca calibration
d18O is a composite of cores 06SB-A1 and 07SB-A2
d18O is a composite of cores 06SB-A1 and 07SB-A2
STM4 Sr/Ca core top was too cold vs STM2, would be careful. STM2 is really good, compares well to Rodrigures core Cabri
Oxygen isotope data has NOT been corrected for the acid fractionation difference (acid-alpha) between standards (calcite) and coral samples (aragonite). Prior to 1895/1896 the data exhibits a kinetic overprint.
No calibrations, two cores are part of this study (see GU99NAU01); Oxygen isotope data has NOT been corrected for the acid fractionation difference (acid-alpha) between standards (calcite) and coral samples (aragonite). Slow growing portion of the record (1898-1939) shows a strong kinetic overprint
The record is a composite of 8 cores across the GBR region; Error is provided in upper and lower bounds; data as anomalies only
The record is a composite of 8 cores across the GBR region; Error is provided in upper and lower bounds; data as anomalies only
The record is a composite of 8 cores across the GBR region; Error is provided in upper and lower bounds; data as anomalies only
This calibration data is taken from the top 40 years of the core from Hetzinger et al 2006
This calibration data is taken from the top 40 years of the core from Hetzinger et al 2006
This calibration data is taken from the top 40 years of the core from Hetzinger et al 2006
This calibration data is taken from the top 40 years of the core from Hetzinger et al 2006
Composite of two fossil cores. Data was sub-monthly and was linearly resampled to monthly.
Composite of two fossil cores. Data was sub-monthly and was linearly resampled to monthly.
Raw data was sub-monthly and was linearly resampled to monthly.
Raw data was sub-monthly and was linearly resampled to monthly.
Sr/Ca regression slope error is estimated to be (+/-) 0.21 degrees C; Used the Zinke (2015) method - normalised and scaled to the s.d. SST box of the period 1961-1990; equation based on composite of 2 cores
Sr/Ca regression slope error is estimated to be (+/-) 0.21 degrees C; Used the Zinke (2015) method - normalised and scaled to the s.d. SST box of the period 1961-1990; equation based on composite of 2 cores
Sr/Ca regression slope error is estimated to be (+/-) 0.21 degrees C; Used the Zinke (2015) method - normalised and scaled to the s.d. SST box of the period 1961-1990; equation based on composite of 2 cores
Sr/Ca regression slope error is estimated to be (+/-) 0.21 degrees C; Used the Zinke (2015) method - normalised and scaled to the s.d. SST box of the period 1961-1990; equation based on composite of 2 cores
Sr/Ca regression slope error is estimated to be (+/-) 0.21 degrees C; Used the Zinke (2015) method - normalised and scaled to the s.d. SST box of the period 1961-1990; equation based on composite of 2 cores
Sr/Ca regression slope error is estimated to be (+/-) 0.21 degrees C; Used the Zinke (2015) method - normalised and scaled to the s.d. SST box of the period 1961-1990; equation based on composite of 2 cores
Core data is a composite of overlapping individual pieces and any replicate analyses. Data is seasonal min-max (Feb - Aug)
regression information based on Kilbourne MS Thesis
regression information based on Kilbourne MS Thesis
This is the bottom part of a core that included an unconformity. Base of the coral is u-series dated and age model is from bands counted up from there.
This is the bottom part of a core that included an unconformity. Base of the coral is u-series dated and age model is from bands counted up from there.
This is the bottom part of a core that included an unconformity. Base of the coral is u-series dated and age model is from bands counted up from there.
This is the bottom part of a core that included an unconformity. Base of the coral is u-series dated and age model is from bands counted up from there.
This is the bottom part of a core that included an unconformity. Base of the coral is u-series dated and age model is from bands counted up from there.
This is the bottom part of a core that included an unconformity. Base of the coral is u-series dated and age model is from bands counted up from there.
used Gagan 1994 d18O slope
1953-1993 and 1961-1993 calibration periods, first with 0.13 slope, latter -0.17 slope
Sr/Ca-SST calibrations listed were found in Linsley et al. 2004. The calibration from Linsley et al. 2000 is as follows: slope = -0.082; intercept = 11.568; rsq = 0.75
Sr/Ca-SST calibrations listed were found in Linsley et al. 2004. The calibration from Linsley et al. 2000 is as follows: slope = -0.082; intercept = 11.568; rsq = 0.75
Sr/Ca-SST calibrations listed were found in Linsley et al. 2004. The calibration from Linsley et al. 2000 is as follows: slope = -0.082; intercept = 11.568; rsq = 0.75
mm-scale drilling but available data is at annual resolution
Individual coral records that are part of the Rarotonga composite
Individual coral records that are part of the Rarotonga composite
authors describe density banding as poor; some fish grazing scars
uncertainty on Sr/Ca intercept is 0.0018
uncertainty on Sr/Ca intercept is 0.0018
uncertainty on Sr/Ca intercept is 0.0018
Calibrations to SST data were performed on a shorter, higher-resolution set of samples. See Murty et al. 2017 for more information.
Sr/Ca-SST calibrations not published because of weak relationship for both GS and NP cores
Sr/Ca-SST calibrations not published because of weak relationship for both GS and NP cores
NP1 and NP2 cores spliced together to get full NP record due to bioerosion in the NP1 core. Sr/Ca-SST calibrations not published because of weak relationship for both GS and NP cores.
NP1 and NP2 cores spliced together to get full NP record due to bioerosion in the NP1 core. Sr/Ca-SST calibrations not published because of weak relationship for both GS and NP cores.
Mean SST ranges given in paper for northern reef 7.7C; for southern reefs 5.8C
Mean SST ranges given in paper for northern reef 7.7C; for southern reefs 5.8C
This record is a combination of high-resolution data from Murty et al. 2018 and annual data from Bryan et al. 2019. Studies are independent but were performed on the same coral core (CG). Calibration information, SST range, and analytical error provided are for high-resolution data from Murty et al. 2018.
This record is a combination of high-resolution data from Murty et al. 2018 and annual data from Bryan et al. 2019. Studies are independent but were performed on the same coral core (CG). Calibration information, SST range, and analytical error provided are for high-resolution data from Murty et al. 2018.
monthly correlations not reported, only assesed with IOD; used Cole et al. (2000) slope of -0.24
Two cores were spliced at 1984 to avoid secondary aragonite
Two cores were spliced at 1984 to avoid secondary aragonite
Two cores were spliced at 1984 to avoid secondary aragonite
Multiple linear regression analyses using monthly (non-detrended) anomalies for coral and instrumental SST and SSS data for the period 1970 to 2008. For NGB core, regression equation is: d18O_anom = 0.15 (0.03)*SST + 0.36 (0.07)*SSS.n
Multiple linear regression analyses using monthly (non-detrended) anomalies for coral and instrumental SST and SSS data for the period 1970 to 2008. For RI core, regression equation is: d18O_anom = 0.03 (0.03)*SST + 0.36 (0.05)*SSS.nn                                        n                                n                        n                n
Multiple linear regression analyses using monthly (not detrended) anomalies for coral and instrumental SST and SSS data for the period 1970 to 2008. For UC core, regression equation is: d18O_anom = 0.09 (0.03)*SST + 0.33 (0.05)*SSS
d18O driven by rainfall; little SST correlation
See Pfeiffer et al. 2004 for more monthly/bimonthly d18O calibrations and Pfeiffer et al. 2019 for annual d18O and Sr/Ca calibrations.
See Pfeiffer et al. 2004 for more monthly/bimonthly d18O calibrations and Pfeiffer et al. 2019 for annual d18O and Sr/Ca calibrations.
Sr/Ca calibration equation originally found in Ramos et al. 2017; Monthly Sr/Ca data available from 1880-2012; Monthly and seasonal (DJFM vs JJAS, data input on Jan and July) d18O data available from 1894-2012 and 1880-1893, respectively.
Sr/Ca calibration equation originally found in Ramos et al. 2017; Monthly Sr/Ca data available from 1880-2012; Monthly and seasonal (DJFM vs JJAS, data input on Jan and July) d18O data available from 1894-2012 and 1880-1893, respectively.
Monthly Sr/Ca data available from 1788-2013; Monthly and seasonal (DJFM vs JJAS, data input on Jan and July) d18O data available from 1906-2013 and 1788-1905 respectively.
Monthly Sr/Ca data available from 1788-2013; Monthly and seasonal (DJFM vs JJAS, data input on Jan and July) d18O data available from 1906-2013 and 1788-1905 respectively.
slope and y-intercept information only available for mean annual calibrations
Study focuses on use of Sr/U rather than Sr/Ca
focused more on Sr/U calibrations
focused more on Sr/U calibrations
focused more on Sr/U calibrations
Study focuses on Ba/Ca and Y/Ca. Sr/Ca is primarily used for chronology
Publication notes that core F4 has higher variance than contemporary cores and instrumental SST products and that this is likely due to lagoonal mixing.
age-modeled assuming high-density bands correspond to February; coral colony died during 1982-83 El Nino event
Due to chipping during initial sampling, the top 1.5 years were sampled in a parallel path and spliced into the rest of the record.
Due to chipping during initial sampling, the top 1.5 years were sampled in a parallel path and spliced into the rest of the record.
The calibration equation incorporated both SST and salinity, so the d18O-SST slope is not included here to avoid misrepresentation.
monthly correlations not reimported
monthly correlations not reported
monthly correlations not reported
monthly correlations with SST not reported
coral was primariliy analysed for Boron and paper does not discuss much about Sr/Ca and d18O even though they were analysed
coral was primariliy analysed for Boron and paper does not discuss much about Sr/Ca and d18O even though they were analysed
Microatoll with core taken from top and side and spliced together; As with all coral timeseries, exact months are not known, so annual averages sometimes represent more or less than 12 months.
Microatoll with core taken from top and side and spliced together; As with all coral timeseries, exact months are not known, so annual averages sometimes represent more or less than 12 months.
Microatoll with core taken from top and side and spliced together; As with all coral timeseries, exact months are not known, so annual averages sometimes represent more or less than 12 months.
Microatoll with core taken from top and side and spliced together; As with all coral timeseries, exact months are not known, so annual averages sometimes represent more or less than 12 months.
Composite of cores C2B (13.1m depth), C4B (8.2m), C6A (11.3m), and CF1B (found on beach); reconstructed d18Osw data are anomalies
Composite of cores C2B (13.1m depth), C4B (8.2m), C6A (11.3m), and CF1B (found on beach); reconstructed d18Osw data are anomalies
Composite of cores C2B (13.1m depth), C4B (8.2m), C6A (11.3m), and CF1B (found on beach); reconstructed d18Osw data are anomalies
Other calibration slopes are available in Zinke et al. 2004; 1920-1995 samples monthly; 1919-1658 sampled bimonthly
Other calibration slopes are available in Zinke et al. 2004; 1920-1995 samples monthly; 1919-1658 sampled bimonthly
in situ d18o; for annual (sr/Ca, slope- -0.0583, intercept - 10.378)
in situ d18o; for annual (sr/Ca, slope- -0.0583, intercept - 10.378)
in situ d18o; for annual (sr/Ca, slope- -0.0583, intercept - 10.378)
Published slopes based on composite coral results. Used -0.20.02 permil per 1 deg C regressions
Published slopes based on composite coral results. Used -0.20.02 permil per 1 deg C regressions
Published slopes based on composite coral results. Used -0.20.02 permil per 1 deg C regressions
Published slopes based on composite coral results. Used -0.20.02 permil per 1 deg C regressions
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSST3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSST3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Sr/Ca-SST recconstructed with composite plus scale method to ERSSTv3b, no regression applied
Totor Sr/Ca core top performed well in many sections, others less good, especially core top since 1988 to 2006. Cabri was much better. There is a table with likely best section in Totor in paper